Which Eschatology do you follow?

There are a myriad of End Times theories to be found among professing Christians today. There is Preterism, Amillennialism, and Dispensationalism, and then there are many sub-theories for each broad category. How do we know which one is correct?

One Christian told me that all the theories are from God. In short, he was implying that God originated all the theories so that He can chose which one works best when the time comes! What he was saying is that God Himself is not really sure which one He will use in the end, so he is leaving Himself some “wiggle room”, so if things don’t work out one way He will have another way out!

Let me ask you; Is this a description of the God of the Bible? Does God need “wiggle room” so he has a way out, in case things don’t work out right? Could God be behind contradictory theories? What does the bible say?

For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. I Corinthians 14:33

The bible is clear that God had planned Salvation from long before He laid the foundation of the earth. (Revelation 13:8) He wrote our DNA at the time that he created man in the garden of Eden, and that DNA is only now beginning to be understood. When I say beginning, I mean that now, after some 6,000 years we have actually begun to scratch the surface of what DNA is, and what it does, but we are a long way from really understanding it.

God, however, spoke the world into existence, and He also spoke our DNA into existence, and long before he did that, He had a plan for Salvation and the human race. No. God does not need “wiggle room”. He has the power to bring about the end of History exactly as He had planned from the beginning. All the human, and angelic, plans aimed at thwarting God’s plan actually end up falling into God’s hands, and into His End Times plan.

So, back to my original question: How do we know which End Times theory is the one that will be carried out in the end?

The answer is rather simple, and yet incredibly complex; The theory that harmonizes all of Scripture is the one that God will carry out in the end.

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:II Timothy 3:16

5 Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him Proverbs 30:5

And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God. Luke 4:4

Many today rebel at the thought that we ought to follow the bible, because they think that they are smarter, and privy to more information, than the authors of the bible. They tell us that God would change if He knew what we know today, making themselves wiser than God!

They have forgotten that the Lord exists outside of time, and sees all of history spread before Him like a book, or a mural.

For thus saith the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity, whose name is Holy; I dwell in the high and holy place, with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones. Isaiah 57:15

Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever. Hebrews 13:8

For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. Malachi 3:6

Since God knows the end from the beginning, there is never the danger that He will come across new information! He knows it all before it happens!

8 Remember this, and shew yourselves men: bring it again to mind, O ye transgressors. 9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, 10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:Isaiah 46:8-10

God knew the end from the beginning, and wrote it in His book. We know, therefore, that everything we need to know is written in the bible. The problem is that it is written in such a way that it can be easily misinterpreted. Why would He do it this way? I think there are a multitude of reasons, among which is His desire to trap His enemies!

He could engineer History so that everyone would come to Him for salvation. If He were to show His glory, we would all come to Him on bended knee and beg Him to save us. The problem is that many would come to Him only because of His power, and because they knew He was the only choice, NOT because they love His character or His person!

14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: 15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them. Matthew 13:14-15

Why would God not want them to be converted, especially when He says He is a God of love? I think it is because He is not willing to save anyone their own way. We come to Him His way, or no way. He does not desire to be used by religious men for their own financial benefit, or for their own gain. Men lift up themselves, but God lifts up Jesus Christ. His plan has everything to do with His character.

So which system follows the literal teaching of the bible the closest? The dispensational, pre-Tribulation rapture theory is the closest to the literal intent of the Author, in my opinion. I must add, however, that wherever dispensationalists stray from the literal interpretation they have made mistakes.

Many times dispensationalists have taken one verse and interpreted it based on their own understanding. When they have done this they have been in error, but this does not mean that the basic dispensational theory is incorrect.

When I was a youth I attended a Fellowship Baptist church in Barrie, Ontario. Our youth pastor, a dispensationalist, told us “Before Christ people were saved by keeping the law, but after Christ we are now saved by grace”. This teaching is common among dispensationalists, and is in error. I would hasten to add, however, that not all dispensationalists hold this view.

The New Testament is clear that keeping the law is impossible, and we are not able to save ourselves this way. Romans 4:21 is states emphatically that if it was possible that a law could have given us life, righteousness would have been by the law, and Jesus would not have had to die. As it is, Messiah had to die.

This being said, however, the bible does teach a pre-Tribulation snatch of the Church. Oh, but there will be hard times before the snatch. Times will be so hard that some will say “We are in the Tribulation!” Satan is working overtime to create a condition that resembles the Tribulation to a great degree. This is something that most dispensationalists have missed, although I understand that now some are coming around to the idea, that some of the Old Testament prophesied wars will occur during the Church age.

The Psalm 83 war and the Gog and Magog war of Ezekiel 38-39 are two wars that form the framework of a counterfeit Tribulation period. There will actually be several years between these events, which will form the time of peace spoken about in at the beginning of the Gog/Magog war in Ezekiel 38:8 & 11.

Satan needs to make you think that this time IS the Tribulation period, so that after it is over, and he introduces his Antichrist to the world, you will accept the Antichrist as “the Christ”, or at least as “a man of God”, and a peacemaker. I’m afraid that at this time, many dispensationalists will modify their theology thinking “We are in the Tribulation and the rapture has not happened yet, therefore the rapture must not be Pre-Trib”! This would be a mistake.

This is why I wrote The Spirit of Prophecy. It is to warn the world of Satan’s scheme to enlist professing Christians in his project to build the kingdom of the Antichrist. New Age authors have been outspoken in saying that the Christian Church would build the kingdom of “the Christ”, yet most pastors have missed this fact. When enemies of God say something like that, we ought to take notice. We ought to be watching to see what Satan is doing. As Paul said “we are not ignorant of (Satan’s) devices” (2 Corinthians 2:11), yet most Christian groups are blissfully ignorant of what Satan is doing in the world, and even in their church!

As it is Christian groups like Purpose Driven, Seeker sensitive, and Emergent Churches are marching in lock-step with these New Age groups. Unfortunately, I’m afraid that many otherwise conservative churches are not all that far behind! Because most churches, including Baptists, have an unbiblical leadership model, it only takes one man to lead the Church in the wrong direction!

So read the Spirit of Prophecy, but don’t trust me. Check everything by the Word of God. If I have made any mistakes, I would be interested in hearing about it, and why it is biblically incorrect. Use Scripture to back up your claim. Opinions have no validity, but Scripture is above all.

Up to this point a couple of readers have said they disagree with me, but both have failed to provide Scriptural evidence to support their point. Remember Christian tradition is still under, and subservient to, the Scriptures.

About dknezacek

An average, ordinary guy. Author, husband, father, pilot, aircraft builder, test pilot, machinist, artist, just ordinary stuff that lots of people do. Don't forget bible student. Dan's passion is bible study, especially including the End Times prophecies.
This entry was posted in Christian Doctrine, Prophecy and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Which Eschatology do you follow?

  1. Pingback: Which Eschatology do you follow? | ChristianBookBarn.com

  2. Sheryl says:

    Great and thought-provoking commentary! I am in complete agreement on every point, but I do hope the Rapture is sooner rather than later because I don’t feel at home here on planet earth, anymore…

    • dknezacek says:

      Hi Sheryl,

      I think Paul was hoping to be in the rapture. Otherwise he would have said “They who are alive and remain” instead of “We who are alive and remain”. All Christians long to be taken in the rapture. Oh! To see Jesus without dying first. To see the faces of your acquaintences as you disappear!

      Personally I think there is a good chance for most adults who are middle aged today, to still be here when it occurs, so take heart!

  3. Colin Ford says:

    I came to your site through DTW. I was very intrigued by your comment dated 23rd December 2010. I will quote you verbatim; comment no. 9; “Something that bothers me about dispensationalism that it hints that some were saved by works at one time. Hebrews tells us that it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sin. Very clearly then anyone who was ever saved, such as Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, and Daniel for example, were all saved by grace. No one was ever saved by works…ever!” ( I say ‘AMEN!’ ).
    Deborah replied in the next comment no 10; “That is the way things worked”. Clearly, she like many other Dispensationalists, believe that OT saints WERE saved by works. Yet Deborah said in her comment, no 23, (same thread); ” It is INCORRECT (emphasis hers) to think that animal sacrifices took away sins in the OT”. I would humbly say that Dispensational theology is WRONG. As can be clearly demonstrated by your own conversation with Deborah (DTW) there is an innate problem with this system of eschatology: It elevates the Church age saints above the father of faith, Abraham, himself!.
    Dispensationalism has caused, and will continue to cause much confusion. It divides the Church from Israel, teaches two ways of salvation, separates law from grace. And as a result of this separate salvation Darby promulgated a pre trib rapture for the Church age saints, which of course the historic, apostolic Church knew nothing of. This system thereby put Israel through the great tribulation, but not the Church. Dispensationalism would have us believe that while Israel are going through their darkest night in recorded history, the Church are celebrating in heaven! The OT saints and prophets knew of no such teaching. Yes we can all carve up periods of history into as many dispensations as we like; but the Hebrew prophets knew of only two ages; pre messianic, and messianic. The Lord IS coming back. But as the Scripture says; post tribulational; Matthew 24.29-31.
    There is much, much more I could say, but for the sake of brevity I will stop here.

    There are two very good books that I highly recommend; “The Old Testament Saints Not To Be Excluded From The Church In Glory”; B.W.Newton. and “The Gospel According To Dispensationalism”; Reginald C Kimbro. These can be obtained from the Sovereign Grace Advent Testimony.
    It matters not what men may call the various systems of theology; Calvinism, Arminianism, Dispensationalism. What is important is, does it agree with the Abiding Word of God?

    • dknezacek says:

      Hi Colin,
      Thanks for writing,

      The problem you discovered in Deborah’s note to me, is that on the issue of salvation before Christ she has stepped beyond the literal plain-sense meaning of the Word of God. What she is doing is not Dispensationalism, because she is adding to Scripture.

      The meaning of Dispensationalism is simply that Scripture must be interpereted in the literal plain-sense meaning of the words used. Dispensationalism is infallible so long as it accepts the plain-sense meaning of the bible.

      The bible does use the word “dispensation” four times in the new testament, though I am not sure the meaning is exactly the same as many dispensationists claim. The truth is that the term is rather new to me, but it fits what I believe.

      Regarding what you said about Abraham;

      Jesus did say that the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than John the Baptizer. Notice that according to Jesus’ words of Matthew 11:11, John the Baptizer would be greater than Abraham;

      Matthew 11:11
      Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.

      I tackled this verse in a recent post, but I would say that the same applies to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The difference is not the means of Salvation, which has always been by grace through faith, but rather the difference is that Church-age believers are permanently indwelt by the Holy Spirit.

      I would challenge you to prove that Abraham had this gift, or any other person in the Old Testament. The difference is not that these people will be resurrected with the Church, or not. The difference is that Abraham, and John the Baptizer, will never experience the permanent indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

      This is why Jesus spoke of John as being “born of women”. He did not experience the new birth, though he was saved. He was only born of a woman. We live in an age where every true believer is born-again and indwelt by the Holy Spirit. This age began at Pentecost and will end at the great snatch, also known as the rapture.

      The post-Church-age believers, of the Tribulation, and the millennial reign will not have the permanent indwelling of the Holy Spirit, just like the pre-Church believers.

      That’s what I believe, and I believe this is what the Scriptures are teaching.

      God bless,


  4. Colin Ford says:

    I would agree with you that Deborah is ‘adding to Scripture’, this would apply to Dispensational theology as a whole; in my honest, and humble opinion.
    According to the AV, yes, you are correct that the word ‘dispensation’ is ‘used’ four times. From my own studies, this word on three of those occasions has the meaning of ‘stewardship’; 1 Corinthians 9.17, Ephesians 3.2, and Colossians 1.25. This is not difficult to understand by reading the context. This is also confirmed by the marginal notes of the Revised Version. The other mention in Ephesians 1.10 does lend itself to a period of time. This might be what you mean when you say ;’I am not sure the meaning is exactly the same as many Dispensationalists claim’?
    I have no problem with the word ‘dispensation’ as regards describing a period of time; the ‘fullness’ of which Paul talks about in Ephesians 1.10. Indeed we have the pre Mosaic dispensation, Mosaic dispensation, and the Church dispensation etc.
    I capitalise ‘dispensation’ when describing the theological system, and use a small ‘d’ when alluding to a period of time.
    I must disagree with you when you say; ‘John the Baptiser would be greater than Abraham’. Matthew 11.11, in my understanding, says; if you read your own quotation of this verse, ‘there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist’. It doesn’t say that John would be greater than Abraham.
    Undoubtedly superior privileges were bestowed upon those who came after the Saviour’s death, resurrection, and ascension to heaven, and the descent of the Holy Spirit. The OT prophets could only look forward to these events (1 Peter 1.10-12), whereas we look back to them. The NT age was also one of greater experiences of God’s grace and power than was the OT era. It is a time of the fullness of the Holy Spirit and the unfolding of that which before was in the shadow; Ephesians 3.9, Colossians 1.26-27. And of course, when it comes to rewards, it does not mean that the NT saints will automatically get better rewards, but all will be judged according to the use they made of the privileges they enjoyed. ‘But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall much be required: and to whom men have committed much, of him will they ask the more.’ Luke 12.48.
    Unlike many Dispensationalists, you do believe, correctly that ALL, without distinction are saved by the ‘Lamb slain from the foundation of the world’; Revelation 13.8.
    What is the ‘Church age’? The Church did NOT begin at Pentecost. The Bible teaches no such doctrine. The Church began when the Lord called out His little flock of disciples. Matthew 16.18, and 18.17 teach that the Church existed well before Pentecost. As regards the Holy Spirit, clearly Acts 2 does indeed teach that the Holy Spirit came in far greater measure, He IS the comforter that dwells in ALL true believers. Before Pentecost, apart from John the Baptist, and his parents, the Holy Spirit came upon old Simeon in Luke 2.
    Never forget that the Bible clearly teaches that there are false professors of the Faith, read the parable of the ‘wheat and the tares’ in Matthew 13. If Dispensational theologians were to honestly admit that the Church, or ‘called out’ ones did indeed begin before Matthew 24, then they have a major problem; the pre tribulation rapture doctrine at once collapses, it becomes untenable.
    I have studied eschatology, seriously for about five years now, and there is much to learn. I believe that the Bible clearly teaches that the Church and Israel are one; Ephesians 2.11-14. Dispensationalists believe and clearly teach that the Church and Israel are two separate entities.
    Maybe you could throw some light on your belief that the ‘Post Church-age believers, of the Tribulation and the millennial reign will not have the permanent indwelling of the Holy Spirit’?

    God bless

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.